How Michael Braxton Handles Complex DUI Cases

DUI Michael Braxton handles complex DUI cases strategically and meticulously in Tampa. By diving into each case, Braxton uses his substantial DUI law knowledge and a network of scientific experts to develop strong defenses for his clients.

Braxton’s proactive approach begins with a client’s arrest. He preserves police body cam footage and breathalyzer machine logs in the hours after an arrest, knowing they are vital. This proof is crucial when the arrest process or sobriety testing may be questioned.

Braxton excels in recurrent DUI cases or those with aggravating conditions like high blood alcohol or accidents. These circumstances carry more significant risks and severe punishments for clients. Braxton carefully examines earlier convictions for legal flaws that could be used to reduce present charges. He challenges habitual offender enhancements that could result in unduly harsh sentences because he knows legal precedents.

In catastrophic injury or fatality instances, Braxton conducts a thorough investigation that often entails reconstruction. He examines road conditions and car mechanics with forensic experts. He aims to present a straightforward, scientifically supported narrative to refute the prosecution and reduce his client’s guilt.

Braxton also handles BAC tests well. He questions the calibration, maintenance, and processing of blood samples to dispute the accuracy of these tests. His questions often include checking staff qualifications and behavior. This intense assessment has usually rendered critical evidence untrustworthy and omitted from consideration.

Braxton’s defense techniques go beyond law and forensic science. He also examines the accused’s mental health and duty as a primary caregiver to mitigate each instance. This integrative approach often leads to reduced charges or rehabilitation programs instead of jail.

Braxton is noted for his aggressive courtroom presence in inevitable trials. He clearly explains legal and scientific topics to jurors. He challenges the prosecution’s evidence and builds a positive narrative around his client, highlighting their character and the arrest.